There are echoes of the early 90’s in the Biden administration’s moves to thwart the American consumer from purchasing EVs manufactured by Chinese firms.

In 1991, the Big 3 from Detroit ─ General Motors, Ford Motor Company and Chrysler Motors Corp ─ filed an anti-dumping petition with the US government against Toyota Motor Corporation, Nissan Motor Corporation, Mazda Motor Corporation and Mitsubishi, accusing the Japanese groups of selling their mini vans in the US at prices that the Big 3 perceived were ‘unfairly’ low.

That petition only succeeded in riling up the American consumer who pushed back strongly against the proposed tariffs on cheaper Japanese cars. A car was then ─ as it remains even now ─ the second most valued asset on a household’s balance sheet (behind the primary home).

Unsurprisingly, a couple of years later, the Big 3 of Detroit quietly shelved their lawsuit.

And so, it’s with a sense of deja vu that I watch the recent announcements from the White House.

After passing the Climate Law last year, which included a tax incentive worth $7,500 for buying an EV manufactured in the US, the Biden Administration made some tweaks recently in the language of the legislation that bars US manufactured EVs from qualifying for the tax break if critical minerals or other battery components are made by a Chinese entity.

Now, with the battery pack making up roughly 40%-50% of an EV’s production cost it’s the early 90’s all over again for the American consumer as the significantly cheaper Chinese EVs have been walled out by the current administration.

Unlike the price variance in the 70’s/80’s (the Japanese manufacturers had priced their cars about 10-13% lower in the US than they did in Japan), this time around the price arbitrage is significant.

As per JATO Dynamics, the average retail price of an electric car available in China is now less than half the price seen in both Europe and the USA. In the first half of 2023, an electric car cost $33,000 in China, $70,700 in Europe, and $72,000 in the U.S.

The Chinese EV industry’s price onslaught on the rest of the world comes from a combination of sustained government subsidies (China has spent about $57 billion, between 2016 and 2022, to support the industry).

That and some clairvoyance.

Its telling that China has already ended it’s 11-year long purchase subsidy program last year, while the US still meanders through tax-incentive related legislations that have had a stop-start sense to them ever since the Obama administration first created the EV tax credit in 2009 to encourage adoption.

Meanwhile, the Chinese EV manufacturers, after already cornering half the global EV sales last year, are making rapid inroads into Europe with plans to expand to the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America over the next couple of years.

For the American car consumer, it’s the early 90’s all over again.

By

Avinash Menon, CFA

Founder and CEO,

52 Seconds Capital Limited

Other New Articles

Both mainstream and social media would like you to believe that there are only two wars on currently.

Well, if you broaden the definition of a ‘war’ to include insurgencies, ethnic, civil conflicts and territorial feuds, then the count of ongoing wars shoots up to ~30.

None of these ~30 countries, however, is Latin American.

Which is unusual since Latin America has traditionally been a stronghold for dictators and was also witness to some of history’s bloodiest wars.

The South American continent has been quiet for a long time now (the last war was fought in 1995 ─ the Cenepa War ─ between Ecuador and Peru).

That’s changed recently after Venezualan President, Maduro, sounded the war drums.

The bone of contention ─ the oil-rich Esequiba region, a territory claimed by Venezuela but controlled by neighbouring Guyana.

History sure does rhyme.

The Venezuelan intent to annex Esequiba has echoes of the Chaco War, fought from 1932 – 1935, between Paraguay and Bolivia, for control of the northern section of the Gran Chaco region.

The cause for that war?

Bolivia and Paraguay (both equally poor nations then) perceived the Chaco region to be oil rich.

There was another interesting twist to the Chaco War: long-forgotten now, but speculation was rife in Latin America then that Gran Chaco was the battleground state not between Bolivia and Paraguay but between Standard Oil (supporting Bolivia) and Shell (supporting Paraguay).

The Chaco War ended in 1935.

Nine decades on.

You know Shell.

On Standard Oil though, you may wonder….

Well, Standard Oil doesn’t exist today. Many of its descendants do though.

You know them today as ExxonMobil, Chevron and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (and many more).

Exxon and its partners (Hess Oil, CNOOC International) have bet a whopping $45 billion on their offshore oil projects in Guyana. The oil majors expect to bring daily capacity to 1.2 million bpd by 2027. (Guyana is so epochal that it influenced Chevron’s $53 billion acquisition of Hess earlier this year)

Maduro’s sounding of the war drums appears to be done with an eye on the elections next year. It is also perhaps a bumbled attempt to invoke his political mentor’s (the late Chavez) ideals as a leader who took on the US oil majors (Chavez had pushed ConocoPhilips and Exxon out of Venezuela in 2007).

Both heavily left-leaning leaders then promptly ran Venezuela into the ground.

Oddly enough, Maduro’s sabre-rattling comes at a time when Latin American powerhouses like Brazil, Mexico and Argentina are considering privatizing their energy assets.

Apart from it being a timely investment, was the Exxon largesse towards Guyana unfiltered feedback by the US oil majors to Venezuela for Chavez’s 2007 diktat?

Only time will tell.

Meanwhile, Maduro may well hark back to the events of the Chaco War and pay heed to that old adage: Don’t beat the drums of war unless you are ready to fight!

By

Avinash Menon, CFA

Founder and CEO,

52 Seconds Capital Limited

Other New Articles